legal update / 27th Aug 2025
Too cold to work? Café worker wins £22k tribunal claim
Is your business too cold to work?
A London café has been ordered to pay more than £22,000 to a part-time worker after she raised concerns about freezing working conditions, that they believed were too cold to work in. The case of Ayad v WL Retail (Whipped London) shows just how quickly a simple complaint can escalate into a costly legal battle.
For UK employers, it’s a sharp reminder: health and safety laws apply to all workplaces, no matter how small, and ignoring staff concerns can lead to tribunal claims.
The case: What happened
- The worker: Leila Ayad, part-time café assistant.
- The complaint: Staff were asked to work with the shop door open in winter. Temperatures dropped to as low as 12 °C—below the Health & Safety Executive’s recommended minimum of 16 °C for indoor workplaces.
- The response: After Ayad raised her concerns on a staff WhatsApp group, her hours were cut and she was later dismissed.
- The outcome: The tribunal found she was unfairly dismissed for making a protected disclosure (raising health and safety concerns). She was awarded compensation covering unfair dismissal, unpaid wages, holiday pay, pension contributions and an ACAS uplift.
- The total: £21,600+ awarded.
Why it matters for employers
- Workplace temperature is a legal issue
UK law does not set a hard minimum temperature, but HSE guidance is clear: 16 °C for most indoor work (13 °C if strenuous), anything lower is too cold to work. Falling short can create legal and health risks.
- Protected disclosures aren’t just “whistle-blowing”
If an employee raises a genuine health or safety concern, it’s legally protected. Cutting hours, disciplining or dismissing them afterwards can be classed as retaliation.
- Tribunal claims snowball quickly
One complaint led to claims of unfair dismissal, unpaid wages, holiday pay, pension breaches, and an ACAS uplift. Costs mount up fast.
- Reputation and compliance go hand-in-hand
Beyond the financial penalty, the case received national media coverage, potentially damaging the café’s brand.