The real cost of employment tribunals for SMEs

SECTION GUIDE

Why Employment Tribunals are a growing risk for SMEs

Employment Tribunal (ET) claims are rising sharply, and for UK SMEs, the impact can be significant.

The Ministry of Justice’s 2025 statistics show that UK tribunals received 42,000 single-claim cases and over 73,000 multiple claims in 2024/25 — a 13% increase on the previous year. (MoJ Tribunal Statistics, 2025)

More worrying still, there were around 491,000 open cases at the end of March 2025, an 11% year-on-year increase.

People Management reports that average case duration is now 9–12 months, up from pre-pandemic levels, as the backlog continues to grow.

The Employment Rights Bill 2025 will further expand “day-one” unfair-dismissal protection, carers’ leave, and predictable-working rights, likely fuelling an even greater rise in claims.

For SMEs without in-house HR or legal teams, one claim can quickly become a costly, time-consuming, and emotionally draining experience, with wider cultural and reputational consequences.

Employment Tribunalimpact hr ident

Understanding the Employment Tribunal process

Employment Tribunals follow a structured, five-stage process. Knowing each stage helps SMEs act early, before costs and complexity escalate.

  • Early Conciliation (ACAS)

    Purpose: To encourage settlement before a claim reaches the tribunal.

    Before an employee can submit an Employment Tribunal claim, they must first notify ACAS. This step is mandatory under Section 18A of the Employment Tribunals Act 1996.

    ACAS will assign a conciliator who contacts both parties confidentially. The goal is to explore whether a voluntary agreement — known as a COT3 settlement — can be reached without a formal hearing.

    Key facts:

    • The standard conciliation period is four weeks, extendable by two weeks if both sides agree.
    • In early 2025, 77% of potential cases were settled or withdrawn before tribunal proceedings began. (ACAS, 2025)
    • All discussions are confidential and “without prejudice” — meaning they cannot be used as evidence later.

    Employer risks:
    Failing to respond promptly or dismissing ACAS engagement can look unreasonable if the case proceeds. Tribunals can consider your behaviour during conciliation when awarding costs.

    Employer actions:

    • Respond quickly and professionally to ACAS contact.
    • Consider negotiation or mediation where feasible.
    • Document all communications and decisions.
    • Seek HR or legal advice before offering settlement terms.
    • Ensure any agreement is formalised in a COT3 — this is the only legally binding settlement method ACAS offers.
  • Claim Submission (ET1) and Employer Response (ET3)

    Purpose: To formally initiate and defend an Employment Tribunal claim.

    If conciliation ends without resolution, the employee can submit an ET1 claim form through the online tribunal service. The form outlines the nature of the complaint — e.g., unfair dismissal, discrimination, or breach of contract — and the remedy sought.

    The tribunal will then notify the employer (the “respondent”) and provide 28 days to submit an ET3 response. The ET3 must outline your defence, include relevant facts, and raise any preliminary objections (for example, jurisdiction or out-of-time arguments).

    Key facts:

    • ET1 and ET3 forms must be submitted electronically.
    • Late or missing ET3 responses may result in a default judgment — meaning the claimant wins automatically.
    • ACAS remains available for settlement discussions even after claim submission.

    Employer actions:

    • Acknowledge receipt immediately and diarise the 28-day deadline.
    • Review the claim carefully and gather evidence (emails, meeting notes, policy documents, etc.).
    • Seek HR or legal advice before drafting the ET3 — wording errors can weaken your defence later.
    • Decide early if you wish to contest all claims or settle selectively.
  • Case management and preparation

    Purpose: To organise the claim before the hearing and identify what issues the tribunal must decide.

    Once accepted, the tribunal issues a Case Management Order. This document sets deadlines for both parties to exchange:

    • Lists of documents (evidence disclosure)
    • Witness statements
    • Chronologies or case summaries
    • Preliminary issue responses (e.g., time limits, employment status, jurisdiction)

    Preliminary hearings may be held virtually to clarify legal points or assess complexity. For example, if a claim involves alleged discrimination, the tribunal might order additional case management to narrow the issues.

    Typical preparation time:
    SMEs should expect to spend 40–100 hours gathering and reviewing documentation, preparing witnesses, and drafting statements.

    Employer actions:

    • Organise evidence early — use clear naming and version control.
    • Train witnesses on tribunal procedure and impartial testimony.
    • Keep a consistent narrative — contradictions between witnesses are often decisive.
    • Adhere strictly to deadlines set by the tribunal.
  • Employment Tribunal
  • Tribunal Hearing

    Purpose: The formal adjudication of the case.

    Hearings are public legal proceedings. They may be conducted in person or remotely.
    Cases are typically heard by:

    • A single Employment Judge (for most claims), or
    • A panel of three (judge plus two lay members) for discrimination and complex cases.

    Each side presents evidence, examines witnesses, and makes closing submissions. Proceedings are recorded, and all judgments are published on GOV.UK’s Employment Tribunal Decisions database.

    Employer experience:

    • Cross-examination can be stressful — witnesses must stay factual and avoid speculation.
    • Employers should ensure full disclosure; withholding relevant evidence can be viewed as unreasonable.
    • Legal representation or HR support can help maintain focus on procedure and avoid reactive responses.

    Costs and timing:

    • Most hearings last 1–5 days, depending on case complexity.
    • Each party usually pays its own costs unless one side is found to have acted “vexatiously or unreasonably.”
  • Judgment and Remedies

    Purpose: To decide liability and award remedies where appropriate.

    After the hearing, the Employment Judge issues a written judgment, usually within a few weeks.
    This may include:

    • Liability decision – whether the claim succeeded.
    • Remedies hearing – to determine compensation amounts.
    • Written reasons – explaining the rationale behind the decision.

    Common remedies include:

    • Reinstatement or re-engagement (rare)
    • Compensation for loss of earnings
    • Injury to feelings awards (for discrimination)
    • Aggravated or exemplary damages (in severe cases)

    Appeals:

    Either party can appeal to the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) on points of law only — for example, if the tribunal misapplied legislation or procedural fairness.
    Appeals must be lodged within 42 days of the written decision.

    Employer actions:

    • Review the judgment promptly and note any compliance deadlines (e.g. payment dates).
    • Seek legal advice immediately if considering appeal.
    • Reflect internally on lessons learned — policy gaps, manager training, or documentation weaknesses.

Employment Tribunal Awards (2023/24)

 

The official MoJ and HMCTS data for 2023/24 highlights the potential financial exposure:

Claim Type Maximum Award Average (Mean) Median
Unfair Dismissal £179,000 £14,000 £6,746
Sex Discrimination £995,000 £53,403 £16,161
Race Discrimination £431,768 £29,532 £10,253
Disability Discrimination £964,465 £44,483 £17,218
Religion or Belief Discrimination £20,000 £10,750 £8,500
Age Discrimination £261,949 £102,891 £86,349

Source: “Tribunal Statistics Quarterly April–June 2024” (Ministry of Justice / HMCTS dataset – Employment and Employment Appeal Tribunal Tables 2023–24)

These numbers show how quickly legal fees, compensation, and reputational damage can escalate — particularly for SMEs handling cases without expert guidance.

Employment Tribunal

The true cost to employers

Beyond awards, defending a claim carries major direct and indirect costs.

  • Average legal defence cost: £8,500 per claim (British Chambers of Commerce)
  • Typical legal-fee ranges:
    • Simple cases: £4,500–£8,000
    • Medium complexity: £8,000–£17,000
    • High complexity: £15,000–£20,000

Hidden costs often exceed the headline figure:

  • Management time: average 4.8 weeks per case (People Management, 2024).
  • Reputational risk: judgments are public on GOV.UK
  • Morale and culture: disputes can divide small teams.
  • Insurance implications: multiple claims may affect premiums.

Combining these factors, the total impact for SMEs often exceeds £25,000 – £30,000 per case.

Why Employment Tribunal claims are increasing

Employment Tribunal activity in the UK has been steadily rising since 2017, when fees for claimants were abolished. But the surge seen since 2022 reflects a much broader combination of social, economic, and legislative shifts that are reshaping workplace expectations.

Below, we break down the key drivers influencing this rise — and what they mean for SME employers.

  • Greater employee awareness and accessibility

    Employees today are more aware of their workplace rights than ever before.

    • Online access: Free resources from ACAS, Citizens Advice, and Gov.uk make it easy for employees to research claims and access tribunal forms directly.
    • Social media influence: Platforms like LinkedIn, TikTok, and Reddit have amplified conversations about unfair treatment, discrimination, and workplace wellbeing — normalising legal recourse when people feel unheard.
    • Union and collective support: Trade unions and online advocacy groups (especially in tech, retail, and care sectors) have become more proactive in supporting tribunal applications.

    impact for SMEs:

    Even small procedural errors, like failing to provide written terms of employment, ignoring a grievance, or miscalculating holiday pay, can lead to formal claims. Employees are increasingly confident navigating these routes without legal representation, often with public support.

  • Changing workforce expectations

    The modern workforce expects more than compliance — it expects fairness, voice, and psychological safety.

    • Post-pandemic values: Hybrid work, work-life balance, and wellbeing are now central expectations, not “perks.”
    • Generational change: Gen Z and younger Millennials are significantly more likely to challenge perceived unfairness or discrimination formally.
    • Cultural accountability: The “speak-up” culture fostered by #MeToo, Black Lives Matter, and neurodiversity movements has increased confidence in calling out poor behaviour or bias.

    Tribunals are increasingly seeing claims rooted in process failure — where the issue isn’t the decision itself, but how it was handled.

    impact for SMEs:

    Inconsistent communication, lack of empathy in management, or inadequate HR processes can all trigger claims even in otherwise fair workplaces.

  • Mental health and wellbeing as a legal frontier

    Work-related stress is now one of the UK’s leading causes of workplace absence and legal claims.

    • The Times (April 2025) reported a sharp rise in mental-health–related discrimination cases, many citing anxiety, depression, or burnout as disabilities under the Equality Act 2010.
    • The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) confirmed that 49% of all work-related ill health in 2024/25 stemmed from stress, depression, or anxiety — equivalent to 17.1 million lost working days across the UK. (HSE Statistics, 2025)
    • Increasingly, employees frame mental health neglect or performance mismanagement as failure to make reasonable adjustments, giving rise to disability discrimination claims.

    impact for SMEs:

    Smaller organisations without formal occupational health or wellbeing policies are especially exposed. Failure to act on early signs of stress — or to follow up on wellbeing concerns — can lead to liability for discrimination or breach of duty of care.

  • High-profile employment tribunal awards and media visibility

    Tribunal outcomes are now public — and high-value cases frequently make national headlines, reinforcing awareness and emboldening claimants.

    • The Guardian (May 2025) reported the case of a Black security manager awarded £361,000 after being racially abused by a colleague — one of the largest discrimination payouts of the year. (The Guardian, 2025)
    • People Management (March 2024) highlighted multiple six-figure awards where employers failed to follow internal grievance procedures or provide proper training.
    • Social media and legal blogs now share tribunal decisions in real time, turning previously private disputes into public case studies.

    impact for SMEs:
    While large corporations can absorb reputational damage, smaller employers may suffer lasting harm to client trust and recruitment prospects.

  • Expanding legal protection and the Employment Rights Bill 2025

    The Employment Rights Bill 2025 represents the most significant expansion of employment rights in over a decade.

    Key provisions include:

    • “Day-one” rights to unfair dismissal, flexible working, and parental leave.
    • Predictable working patterns for workers on irregular hours or zero-hours contracts.
    • Stronger protections for whistleblowers and carers.
    • Extended record-keeping obligations for holiday pay and working time.

    As these rights come into force, the threshold for legitimate dismissal or fair treatment will tighten considerably.

    impact for SMEs:

    Processes that were legally acceptable just a few years ago — such as probationary dismissals without investigation, informal flexible-working refusals, or vague holiday records — could now trigger claims.

  • Employment Tribunal

How SMEs Can Protect Themselves

Employment Tribunals are not inevitable — most can be prevented with the right structure, culture, and advice.

Audit and Update Policies RegularlyReveal

Employment law changes constantly — and so do workplace realities. Outdated or inconsistent policies are one of the most common reasons SME employers lose tribunal cases.

Why it matters:
Tribunals assess not just the fairness of a decision but whether you had and followed a clear policy. A disciplinary, grievance, or equality policy last updated before 2023, for example, may miss recent statutory updates like flexible working, predictable hours, or day-one unfair-dismissal rights.

What to do:

  • Review your contracts, employee handbooks, and policies at least once a year or following major legislative updates (like the Employment Rights Bill 2025).
  • Ensure all policies clearly reference ACAS Codes of Practice and your organisation’s specific procedures.
  • Align policies with your current culture — for example, hybrid-working expectations, data protection, or social-media conduct.
  • Keep signed employee acknowledgements for new policies to evidence awareness.

Train and Empower Line ManagersReveal

Managers are your first line of defence against legal risk — yet many SMEs underinvest in their training.

Why it matters:

Around 80% of tribunal claims start because an employee felt unheard or unfairly treated by their direct manager. Most of these could be avoided with better communication, consistency, and documentation.

What to do:

  • Train all people managers in key HR fundamentals: disciplinary and grievance procedures, equality and inclusion, absence management, documentation, and conflict resolution.
  • Refresh training at least every 12–18 months — tribunals can treat outdated training as ineffective (see Allay v Gehlen, 2021).
  • Empower managers to handle early conversations confidently rather than delaying or escalating unnecessarily.
  • Embed emotional intelligence and wellbeing awareness in leadership programmes.

Document Every ActionReveal

Tribunal judges rely heavily on evidence and chronology — not memory or good intentions.
If it isn’t written down, it didn’t happen.

Why it matters:
Contemporaneous records — meeting notes, signed warnings, email confirmations — can make the difference between winning and losing a case. Even a short email confirming a discussion shows fairness and transparency.

What to do:

  • Record all key meetings, investigations, and disciplinary steps in writing.
  • Store documents securely and consistently (consider HR software for audit trails).
  • Use dated witness statements and file signed copies of policy acknowledgements.
  • Retain records for at least six years to align with statutory limitation periods.

Engage Early with ACAS or HR SupportReveal

Most disputes can be resolved long before they reach a tribunal — but only if employers act quickly and professionally.

Why it matters:

Under ACAS Early Conciliation, 77% of claims are settled or withdrawn before hearing. Engaging early demonstrates good faith and may reduce potential compensation by showing “reasonableness.”

What to do:

  • Treat all grievances seriously and respond within your policy timelines.
  • If ACAS contacts you, engage immediately — silence can appear obstructive.
  • Consider mediation or a structured settlement (e.g., COT3 agreement) to protect both parties and avoid public litigation.
  • Seek advice before responding; one mis-phrased email or offer can weaken your position later.

Partner with impact HRReveal

Prevention is always more cost-effective than defence. Working with impact HR gives you peace of mind that your people processes are fair, current, and legally compliant.

Why it matters:
Tribunal costs average £8,500–£20,000 — but the true cost of distraction, morale damage, and reputational loss is far higher. A retained HR partnership ensures you never face these risks alone.

What to do:

  • Choose a support model that fits your business — from retained HR packages to project-based support.
  • Schedule annual HR audits to review documentation, policies, and training needs.
  • Use impact HR’s impact Hub for continuous updates, templates, and legal briefings.
  • Empower your managers with access to real-time HR advice whenever challenges arise.

Your Questions Answered

Everything you need to know about Employment Tribunals

  • How long does a typical employment tribunal take?Reveal

    Most claims take 6–12 months, depending on complexity and tribunal backlog.

  • Can an employee make an employment tribunal claim with less than two years’ service?Reveal

    Yes — for discrimination, whistleblowing, or health-and-safety claims.

  • What should employers do upon receiving an ET1 form?Reveal

    Contact ACAS or impact HR immediately and file an ET3 within 28 days.

  • How can impact HR help?Reveal

    We provide end-to-end HR risk management, from documentation and training to case response and ACAS liaison.

Make an enquiry

Let’s talk

Start making your impact.

Whether you need day-to-day HR support, ad-hoc support or a long-term partner, we’re here to help.

Get in touch for a free initial chat — no pressure, just practical advice from people who get it.

0330 2369866
hello@impacthr.co.uk

Leicester: 6 St. Georges Way, 3rd Floor, St. George’s House, Leicester LE1 1QZ
London: 167 City Road, London EC1V 1AW
Leeds: Building 3, City West Business Park, Gelderd Rd, Holbeck, Leeds LS12 6LN
Essex: Halford House, 2 Coval Lane, Chelmsford, England, CM1 1TD

You may also like Explore more content to keep you informed and up to date with the latest HR resources